Comments on: Elections, Journalistic Rhetoric, Electoral Reform http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform mathematics and philosophy education Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:48:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mnem http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-87 mnem Mon, 10 May 2010 13:57:00 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-87 Good post, and well explained.<br><br>There was an interesting article in New Scientist recently, "Why democracy is always unfair": <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581.400-electoral-dysfunction-why-democracy-is-always-unfair.html?full=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581....</a><br><br>Worth a read, if you haven't already caught it. Good post, and well explained.

There was an interesting article in New Scientist recently, “Why democracy is always unfair”: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581….

Worth a read, if you haven't already caught it.

]]> By: mnem http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-103 mnem Mon, 10 May 2010 08:57:00 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-103 Good post, and well explained. There was an interesting article in New Scientist recently, "Why democracy is always unfair": http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581.400-electoral-dysfunction-why-democracy-is-always-unfair.html?full=true Worth a read, if you haven't already caught it. Good post, and well explained.

There was an interesting article in New Scientist recently, “Why democracy is always unfair”: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581.400-electoral-dysfunction-why-democracy-is-always-unfair.html?full=true

Worth a read, if you haven’t already caught it.

]]> By: David http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-86 David Sun, 09 May 2010 15:53:35 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-86 Greatly appreciate the clarity of this post. Very helpful!<br><br>I was trying to work out some of these figures myself; am chuffed that I got one or two right results! ;) Greatly appreciate the clarity of this post. Very helpful!

I was trying to work out some of these figures myself; am chuffed that I got one or two right results! ;)

]]> By: Lindsey http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-85 Lindsey Sun, 09 May 2010 12:13:56 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-85 Really great post Alec! I had not realised the percentages were so low - I only knew the official 36.1%. Really great post Alec! I had not realised the percentages were so low – I only knew the official 36.1%.

]]> By: David Reimer http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-102 David Reimer Sun, 09 May 2010 10:53:00 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-102 Greatly appreciate the clarity of this post. Very helpful! I was trying to work out some of these figures myself; am chuffed that I got one or two right results! ;) Greatly appreciate the clarity of this post. Very helpful!

I was trying to work out some of these figures myself; am chuffed that I got one or two right results! ;)

]]> By: Lindsey http://www.ptolemy.co.uk/uncategorized/elections-journalistic-rhetoric-electoral-reform#comment-101 Lindsey Sun, 09 May 2010 07:13:00 +0000 http://ptolemy.co.uk/?p=366#comment-101 Really great post Alec! I had not realised the percentages were so low - I only knew the official 36.1%. Really great post Alec! I had not realised the percentages were so low – I only knew the official 36.1%.

]]>